{"id":7324,"date":"2026-03-31T00:57:09","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T00:57:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/?p=7324"},"modified":"2026-03-31T01:02:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T01:02:13","slug":"word-of-the-day-unadulterated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/2026\/03\/31\/word-of-the-day-unadulterated\/","title":{"rendered":"Word of the Day: Unadulterated"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Today\u2019s word of the day, courtesy of Words Coach (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wordscoach.com\/dictionary\">https:\/\/www.wordscoach.com\/dictionary<\/a>), is <em>unadulterated<\/em>. Pronounced \/ \u02cc\u028cn \u0259\u02c8d\u028cl t\u0259\u02ccre\u026a t\u026ad \/, with the primary stress on the third syllable and secondary stresses on the first and fifth syllables, this adjective means \u201cnot diluted or made impure by adulterating; pure\u201d or \u201cutter; absolute\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dictionary.com\/browse\/unadulterated\">https:\/\/www.dictionary.com\/browse\/unadulterated<\/a>). Merriam-Webster says it means \u201cnot adulterated : pure\u201d or \u201ccomplete, unqualified\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/unadulterated\">https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/unadulterated<\/a>). It also says that its first known use is \u201ccirca 1719, in the meaning defined at sense 1\u201d (ibid.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But <a href=\"http:\/\/www.etymonline.com\">www.etymonline.com<\/a> says that it appears first in the language in the \u201c1530s, back-formation from <strong>adulteration<\/strong>, or else from Latin <em>adulteratus<\/em>, past participle of <em>adulterare \u2018<\/em>to falsify, corrupt,\u2019 also \u2018to commit adultery.\u2019 An earlier verb was <em>adultery <\/em>(late 14c. in the sense \u2018make impure\u2019), directly from the Latin verb, but this English verb also carried the meaning \u2018commit adultery\u2019\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/word\/unadulterated\">https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/word\/unadulterated<\/a>). Now, we\u2019ve had this before, where a word is defined by another word, so we have to look at the other word, <em>adulteration<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Adulteration first appears \u201cc. 1500, \u2018act of adulterating; state of being debased by mixture with something else,\u2019 generally of inferior quality, from Latin <em>adulterationem <\/em>(nominative <em>adulteratio<\/em>) \u2018an adulteration, sophistication,\u2019 noun of action from past-participle stem of <em>adulterare \u2018<\/em>corrupt, falsify; debauch; commit adultery,\u2019 from <em>ad \u2018<\/em>to\u2019 (see <strong>ad-<\/strong>) + <em>alterare \u2018<\/em>to alter\u2019 (see <strong>alter<\/strong>), though Watkins explains it as <em>ad alterum \u2018<\/em>(approaching) another (unlawfully).\u2019 Meaning \u2018a result of adulterating\u2019 is from 1650s\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adulteration\">https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adulteration<\/a>). So it means, basically, to change something for the worse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It also has the meaning of adultery, so we might benefit from looking up the history of that word. It appears \u201cc. 1300, <em>avoutrie<\/em>, from Old French <em>avouterie <\/em>(12c., later <em>adulterie<\/em>, Modern French <em>adult\u0115re<\/em>), noun of condition from <em>avoutre<\/em>, from Latin <em>adulterare \u2018<\/em>commit adultery; corrupt,\u2019 from <em>ad \u2018<\/em>to\u2019 (see <strong>ad-<\/strong>) + <em>alterare \u2018<\/em>to alter\u2019 (see <strong>alter<\/strong>). Compare <strong>adulteration<\/strong>. The spelling was corrected toward Latin from early 15c. in English, following French (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/word\/ad-\"><strong>ad-<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIn Middle English, also \u2018sex between husband and wife for recreational purposes; idolatry, perversion, heresy.\u2019 As a crime, formerly classified as <em>single adultery <\/em>(with an unmarried person) and <em>double adultery <\/em>(with a married person). The Old English word was <em>\u00e6wbryce \u2018<\/em>breach of law(ful marriage)\u2019 (similar formation in German <em>Ehebruch<\/em>). In translations of the 7th Commandment it is understood to mean \u2018lewdness or unchastity\u2019 of any kind, in act or thought\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adultery\">https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adultery<\/a>). So adultery is a specific kind of corruption that involves a specific kind of making something impure by mixing something into something that would otherwise be pure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now you might be wondering if there is a connection to the word <em>adult<\/em>. I mean, adults are the ones who commit adultery, right, and many people believe that a child cannot be corrupt (I think those are mostly people who have never had children). So does <em>adult<\/em> come from the same source? The answer is \u201cno,\u201d even though adult also appears in English in the \u201c1530s (but not common until mid-17c.) \u2018grown, mature,\u2019 from Latin <em>adultus \u2018<\/em>grown up, mature, adult, ripe,\u2019 past participle of <em>adolescere \u2018<\/em>grow up, come to maturity, ripen,\u2019 from <em>ad \u2018<\/em>to\u2019 (see <strong>ad-<\/strong>) + <em>alescere \u2018<\/em>be nourished,\u2019 hence, \u2018increase, grow up,\u2019 inchoative of <em>alere \u2018<\/em>to nourish,\u2019 from a suffixed form of PIE root <strong>*al-<\/strong> (2) \u2018to grow, nourish\u2019\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adult\">https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=adult<\/a>). So despite the similarity in spelling, one comes from the Latin root <em>alterare<\/em> and the other from the Latin root <em>alescere<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On this date in 1842, \u201cDr. Crawford W. Long of Jefferson, Georgia, first used ether as an anesthetic during a minor operation\u201d (https:\/\/onthisday.net\/science\/).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ether \u201cwas originally discovered in 1540 by Valerius Cordus, a Prussian Botanist. He made ether by distilling sulfuric acid with fortified wine to make what he termed \u2018oleum vitrioli dulce,\u2019 or sweet oil of vitriol.&nbsp; For the next 200 years, ether was used as a medicine, taken in drops as a stimulant to relieve spasms or convulsions\u201d (https:\/\/histmed.collegeofphysicians.org\/ether-in-surgery\/). Then a funny thing happened: college students began to use ether as a recreational drug. At what they called \u201cEther Frolics,\u201d \u201cAmerican students would cover their mouths and noses with ether-soaked towels, and thus go into a euphoric state\u201d (ibid.). Dr. Long attended one of these \u201cFrolics,\u201d and he \u201cobserved the effects of ether and noticed that people who fell or got into fist fights did not feel any pain\u201d (ibid.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So he decided to try using ether during surgery. To us anesthesia is routine whenever we have a medical procedure done, but before 1842, the only anesthesia was a stiff drink, and it didn\u2019t really work that well. Not only did patients dread the prospect of surgery, doctors did as well, or at least those doctors who could empathize with their patients. So on this date, Long \u201cplaced an ether-soaked towel over the face of James Venable and removed a tumour from his neck. This event predated Morton&#8217;s public demonstration of ether by four years, but was not disclosed until 1849 in the Southern Medical Journal, which was after Morton&#8217;s widely publicized feat. [William Thomas Green Morton was a dentist who demonstrated the use of ether as an anesthetic in 1846.] However, Dr. Long&#8217;s accomplishment in 1842 is now widely considered to represent the discovery of surgical anesthesia\u201d (https:\/\/onthisday.net\/science\/).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ether is not used very much as an anesthetic today, at least not in developed nations. It has several problems: it\u2019s flammable, it can cause nausea and vomiting, it \u201cwas irritating to the respiratory tract, causing coughing and airway irritation in some patients,\u201d and the \u201cinduction of anesthesia with ether was relatively slow, and patients often experienced a prolonged recovery period\u201d (https:\/\/advancestudy.org\/do-doctors-still-use-ether\/). But some people have proposed returning to the use of ether in developing countries because it is relatively inexpensive and easy to manufacture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I was seven or eight years old when I got my tonsils out. I really don\u2019t remember much about it except for the promise of ice cream. I don\u2019t remember how much pain I experienced or how long I stayed in the hospital. I do, however, remember the ether.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The doctor put a mask over my mouth and nose, and he told me to breath normally and count backwards from 100. I think I got to 96. But what I really remember was that I found myself in an ocean of grey, and I felt like I was drowning in that ocean. The whole dream was momentary, but I clearly remember it. It was frightening, but it was vivid. I have never had that experience with any other anesthetic, and I have had a few surgeries over the years. I can imagine that it would still be effective, as long as it is unadulterated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Today\u2019s image is of a oil painting by Ernest Board of the first use of ether in dental surgery, by William Thomas Green Morton (https:\/\/daily.jstor.org\/19th-century-anesthesia-and-the-politics-of-pain\/).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today\u2019s word of the day, courtesy of Words Coach (https:\/\/www.wordscoach.com\/dictionary), is unadulterated. Pronounced \/ \u02cc\u028cn \u0259\u02c8d\u028cl t\u0259\u02ccre\u026a t\u026ad \/, with the primary stress on the third syllable and secondary stresses [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7325,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[238,980,395,284,979],"class_list":["post-7324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-word-of-the-day","tag-dictionary","tag-ether","tag-etymology","tag-linguistics","tag-unadulterated","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7324"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7326,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7324\/revisions\/7326"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}