{"id":5581,"date":"2020-04-27T08:00:27","date_gmt":"2020-04-27T08:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/?p=5581"},"modified":"2020-04-28T04:02:28","modified_gmt":"2020-04-28T04:02:28","slug":"word-of-the-day-pragmatic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/2020\/04\/27\/word-of-the-day-pragmatic\/","title":{"rendered":"Word of the Day: Pragmatic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Today\u2019s Word of the Day, thanks to WordThink.com, is <em>pragmatic<\/em>. <em>Pragmatic<\/em> is an adjective that means \u201cMore concerned with practical results than with theories and principles.\u201d According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dictionary.com\">www.dictionary.com<\/a>, it means \u201cof or relating to a practical point of view or practical considerations\u201d or \u201ctreating historical phenomena with special reference to their causes, antecedent conditions, and results.\u201d It also has two more specialized meanings based upon philosophy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.etymonline.com\">www.etymonline.com<\/a>, the word entered the English language in the \u201c1610s, \u2018meddlesome, impertinently busy,\u2019 short for earlier <strong>pragmatical<\/strong>, or else from Middle French <em>pragmatique<\/em> (15c.), from Latin <em>pragmaticus <\/em>\u2018skilled in business or law,\u2019 from Greek <em>pragmatikos <\/em>\u2018fit for business, active, business-like; systematic,\u2019 from <em>pragma <\/em>(genitive <em>pragmatos<\/em>) \u2018a deed, act; that which has been done; a thing, matter, affair,\u2019 especially an important one; also a euphemism for something bad or disgraceful; in plural, \u2018circumstances, affairs\u2019 (public or private), often in a bad sense, \u2018trouble,\u2019 literally \u2018a thing done,\u2019 from stem of <em>prassein<\/em>\/<em>prattein<\/em> \u2018to do, act, perform\u2019 (see <strong>practical<\/strong>). Meaning \u2018matter-of-fact\u2019 is from 1853. In some later senses from German <em>pragmatisch<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On this date in 1861, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Habeas corpus<\/em> is a Latin phrase meaning \u201cliterally \u2018(you should) have the person,\u2019 in phrase&nbsp;<em>habeas corpus ad subjiciendum<\/em>&nbsp;\u2018produce or have the person to be subjected to (examination),\u2019 opening words of writs in 14c. Anglo-French documents to require a person to be brought before a court or judge, especially to determine if that person is being legally detained. From&nbsp;<em>habeas<\/em>, second person singular present subjunctive of&nbsp;<em>habere<\/em>&nbsp;\u2018to have, to hold\u2019 (from PIE root&nbsp;<strong>*ghabh-<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2018to give or receive\u2019) +&nbsp;<em>corpus<\/em>&nbsp;\u2019person,\u2019 literally \u2018body\u2019 (see&nbsp;<strong>corporeal<\/strong>) (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=habeas+corpus\">https:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/search?q=habeas+corpus<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Americans have a Constitutional right to <em>habeas corpus<\/em>, which means that the person or people who arrest someone must prove to a court that they have the authority to arrest and detain that person. In other words, the police cannot just arrest you and throw you into the clink for days or weeks or months. They have to demonstrate that they have a legitimate case against you in front of a judge. And that judge gets to decide whether you stay in jail or not, prior to a trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article 1 of the US Constitution addresses the power and limitations of the legislature of the US government. It is in Section 9 that we find the only mention of <em>habeas corpus<\/em> in the Constitution. It says, \u201cThe privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/constitution\/articlei\">https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/constitution\/articlei<\/a>). This brief sentence is the only mention of habeas corpus in the Constitution. The power to suspend this essential right of the people is granted to the legislature only in the case of rebellion or invasion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And in 1861, the US was facing rebellion. Most of the Southern states, including Virginia on April 17, 1861, had seceded from the Union, and Lincoln was fighting a war to force those Southern states back in. Maryland had not, in April of 1861, but Lincoln was concerned that it might. There were Southern sympathizers in Maryland, and Lincoln was concerned that the Maryland legislature was not loyal. The North\u2019s supply lines to Washington, DC, ran through Maryland. So in order to prevent the Southern sympathizers from fomenting rebellion or causing violence against the Union. So on this date Lincoln ordered General Winfield Scott to suspend <em>habeas corpus<\/em> near any military lines between Philadelphia and Washington. He claimed that his authority came from Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, but as we have already seen, that article authorizes the legislature to suspend <em>habeas corpus<\/em>, not the president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to James A. Dueholm, \u201cOn May 25, federal troops arrested John Merryman in Cockeysville, Maryland, for recruiting, training, and leading a drill company for Confederate service. Merryman&#8217;s lawyer promptly petitioned Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, sitting as a trial judge, for a writ of habeas corpus (<a href=\"https:\/\/quod.lib.umich.edu\/j\/jala\/2629860.0029.205\/--lincoln-s-suspension-of-the-writ-of-habeas-corpus?rgn=main;view=fulltext\">https:\/\/quod.lib.umich.edu\/j\/jala\/2629860.0029.205\/&#8211;lincoln-s-suspension-of-the-writ-of-habeas-corpus?rgn=main;view=fulltext<\/a>). Taney eventually ruled against Lincoln. But Lincoln ignored the ruling. In July, he ordered the suspension of habeas corpus between New York and Philadelphia, despite Taney\u2019s ruling. Lincoln\u2019s order stayed in effect until 1863, when Congress passed legislation suspending habeas corpus for the public safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lincoln\u2019s suspension of habeas corpus from 1861 to 1863 was in clear violation of the Constitution, and he ignored the order of a judge in maintaining it. But he was being pragmatic. There have been a governors around the country in the last month or so issuing questionable orders for people to stay at home and for small business to close. The Michigan governor actually told wealthy citizens that they could not travel to their second homes within the state, though she claimed that she had no authority to prevent citizens of other states from traveling to their second homes within Michigan. But all these governors have justified their actions because of pragmatics, because things need to be done to slow the pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the conundrum\u2014do we suspend people\u2019s rights for good reasons, to be pragmatic? Or do we uphold people\u2019s fundamental rights no matter what?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The picture is from 1861 and shows John Merryman, the Marylander whose detainment led to Judge Taney\u2019s decision against Lincoln\u2019s suspension of habeas corpus, holding a copy of Taney\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today\u2019s Word of the Day, thanks to WordThink.com, is pragmatic. Pragmatic is an adjective that means \u201cMore concerned with practical results than with theories and principles.\u201d According to www.dictionary.com, it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5582,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[184,153,271,272,273],"class_list":["post-5581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-word-of-the-day","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-pragmatic","tag-rights","tag-violation","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5581"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5583,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5581\/revisions\/5583"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}