{"id":4803,"date":"2020-01-04T09:26:00","date_gmt":"2020-01-04T09:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/?p=4803"},"modified":"2020-01-05T04:27:49","modified_gmt":"2020-01-05T04:27:49","slug":"word-of-the-day-equivocal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/2020\/01\/04\/word-of-the-day-equivocal\/","title":{"rendered":"Word of the Day: Equivocal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Today\u2019s word of the day, courtesy of http:\/\/www.wordthink.com\/<\/a>, is equivocal, an adjective that means \u201cOpen to more than one interpretation; ambiguous. Uncertain or questionable in nature.\u201d Dictionary.com provides three definitions: 1. \u201callowing the possibility of several different meanings, as a word or phrase, especially with intent to deceive or misguide; susceptible of double interpretation; deliberately ambiguous\u201d; 2. \u201cof doubtful nature or character; questionable; dubious; suspicious\u201d: and 3. \u201cof uncertain significance; not determined.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to www.etymonline.com<\/a>, equivocal entered the language \u201cc. 1600, with -al<\/strong> + Late Latin aequivocus<\/em> \u2018of identical sound, of equal voice, of equal significance, ambiguous, of like sound,\u2019 past participle of aequivocare<\/em>, from aequus<\/em> \u2018equal\u2019 (see equal<\/strong> (adj.)) + vocare<\/em> \u2018to call\u2019 (from PIE root *wekw-<\/strong> \u2018to speak\u2019). Earlier in same sense was equivoque<\/em> (late 14c.).\u201d A transliteration of aequivocare would be to call equally one thing or another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On this date in 1896, Utah became the 44th<\/sup> state of the union. Some of the territories around Utah had become states years earlier than Utah, but Utah\u2019s journey was somewhat different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What we now called Utah began to be settled by Mormons (members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints) in 1847, after they had traveled across the country escaping religious persecution. The persecution was a result of Joseph Smith\u2019s having a vision in which an angel led him to some golden tablets with writing. The writing concerned an ancient people and an ancient prophet, named Mormon. Smith translated these tablets and founded his new church.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Smith\u2019s followers and converts began in Upstate, New York, moved to Ohio, and Missouri, and then to Indiana. Everywhere they went, they quarreled with each other and with the Christian settlers. In 1844, the Mormon War took place in Indiana, and Joseph Smith and his brother Hyram, who would have been the natural successor to Joseph Smith, were both killed. The members of the church split up, but most of them followed Brigham Young to Utah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the religious beliefs that caused other Americans to object to the Mormons was their practice of polygamy (technically it was polygyny: the first is having more than one spouse at a time, and the latter is having more than one wife at a time). A little about polygamy. Plural marriage was allowed in Jewish culture when the Christian church got started as a part of that Jewish faith. Unfortunately for the Jews, polygamy was not permitted in Roman culture, and a couple of Roman emperors even declared it illegal, though the law had no effect on the Jews. A number of early church fathers wrote against polygamy. Then, during the medieval period, a variety of church councils condemned not only polygyny but also the keeping of a concubine while being married.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From the medieval period on, the Christian church did not permit polygamy of any sort, and since the governments of most Western countries were tied directly to the Christian church, the states also did not allow polygamy. Thus, when the Mormons began to practice plural marriage, many Christians in the United States objected strongly. So when Utah petitioned the federal government to become a state instead of just a territory, the federal government demanded that the Utah government, which was, admittedly, the same as the leadership of the Mormon church, make polygamy illegal. Utah tried to become a state for almost 50 years, but the issue of polygamy was too much for many in the United States to overcome. The church officially abandoned the practice of plural marriage in 1890, though some followers of the faith continued the practice and even continue it till this day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1894, Congress passed the Utah Enabling Act, which set forth the way Utah could become a state. And on this date, Utah was officially admitted as a state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1903, the people of Utah elected Reed Smoot as one of their senators. This choice led to the Reed Smoot hearings, held by the Senate to determine whether to allow Reed Smoot to take his seat, and the major concern was polygamy. The hearings went on for about three years. Among Smoot\u2019s supporters was a senator from Pennsylvania named Boies Penrose: \u201cSmoot\u2019s Utah Mormonism advocated polygamy, though Smoot had only one wife. Penrose took to his feet, scowled at philandering colleagues, and asserted: \u2018As for me, I would rather have seated beside me in this chamber a polygamist who doesn\u2019t polyg than a monogamist who doesn\u2019t monog\u2019\u201d (Beers, Paul B., Pennsylvania Politics Today and Yesterday: The Tolerable Accomodation [University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1980], p. 51).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have to say this about Boies Penrose: there\u2019s nothing equivocal about what he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The image is from https:\/\/ilovehistory.utah.gov\/topics\/statehood\/index.html<\/a>, and the caption says, \u201cA choir sings in the Salt Lake LDS Tabernacle in 1896. The decorations on the organ pipes celebrate Utah’s becoming a state.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today\u2019s word of the day, courtesy of http:\/\/www.wordthink.com\/, is equivocal, an adjective that means \u201cOpen to more than one interpretation; ambiguous. Uncertain or questionable in nature.\u201d Dictionary.com provides three definitions: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4804,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-word-of-the-day","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4803"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4805,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4803\/revisions\/4805"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}