{"id":4728,"date":"2019-12-10T01:44:00","date_gmt":"2019-12-10T01:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/?p=4728"},"modified":"2019-12-10T01:51:08","modified_gmt":"2019-12-10T01:51:08","slug":"word-of-the-day-oxymoron","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/2019\/12\/10\/word-of-the-day-oxymoron\/","title":{"rendered":"Word of the Day: Oxymoron"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Mirriam-Webster word of the day for today is <em>oxymoron<\/em>. The dictionary defines it as \u201ca combination of&nbsp;contradictory&nbsp;or incongruous words (such as&nbsp;<em>cruel kindness<\/em>);&nbsp;<em>broadly<\/em>&nbsp;<strong>:<\/strong>&nbsp;something (such as a concept) that is made up of contradictory or incongruous elements\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/word-of-the-day\">https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/word-of-the-day<\/a>). The dictionary continues, \u201cThe Greeks exhaustively classified the elements of rhetoric, or effective speech and writing, and gave the name oxymoron\u2014literally \u2018pointed foolishness\u2019\u2014to the deliberate juxtaposing of seemingly contradictory words. The roots of oxymoron, <em>oxys<\/em> meaning \u2018sharp\u2019 or \u2018keen,\u2019 and <em>m\u014dros<\/em> meaning \u2018foolish,\u2019 are nearly antonyms themselves, making <em>oxymoron<\/em> nicely self-descriptive. <em>Oxymoron<\/em> originally applied to a meaningful paradox condensed into a couple of words, as in \u2018precious bane,\u2019 \u2018lonely crowd,\u2019 or \u2018sweet sorrow.\u2019 Today, however, what is commonly cited as an oxymoron is often simply a curiosity of language, where one or both elements have multiple meanings (<em>shrimp<\/em> in \u2018jumbo shrimp\u2019 doesn&#8217;t mean \u2018small\u2019; it refers to a sea creature), or a phrase whose elements seem antithetical in spirit, such as \u2018classic rock.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.etymonline.com\">www.etymonline.com<\/a>, the word entered the language in the \u201c1650s, from Greek&nbsp;<em>oxym\u014dron<\/em>, noun use of neuter of&nbsp;<em>oxym\u014dros<\/em>&nbsp;(adj.) \u2018pointedly foolish,\u2019 from&nbsp;<em>oxys<\/em>&nbsp;\u2018sharp, pointed\u2019 (from PIE root&nbsp;<strong>*ak-<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2018be sharp, rise (out) to a point, pierce\u2019) +&nbsp;<em>m\u014dros<\/em>&nbsp;\u2018stupid\u2019 (see&nbsp;<strong>moron<\/strong>). The word itself is an illustration of the thing. Now often used loosely to mean \u2018contradiction in terms.\u2019&#8221; You might remember that the English Renaissance was a period when a lot of \u201cink horn\u201d terms came into the language from the classical languages. Oh, and according to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dictionary.com\">www.dictionary.com<\/a>, it is pronounced &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;\/ \u02cc\u0252k\u2009s\u026a\u02c8m\u0254r\u2009\u0252n, \/, with the primary stress on the third syllable. I have heard people pronounce it with the primary stress on the second syllable, but General American Speech says otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are lots of popular oxymorons. Here are a few of the more popular ones:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He was in military intelligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is another fine mess you have got us into (if this is not familiar to you, you need to watch some Laurel and Hardy, though the actual quote says \u201cnice mess\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Suddenly the room filled with a deafening silence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The comedian was seriously funny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Do you have the original copies that we requested?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is a genuine imitation Rolex watch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These came from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vappingo.com\/word-blog\/64-examples-of-oxymorons-in-sentences\/\">https:\/\/www.vappingo.com\/word-blog\/64-examples-of-oxymorons-in-sentences\/<\/a>, but they are all pretty well known. On the other hand, the same webpage lists these two:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You are clearly confused by the situation you have found yourself in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>His new girlfriend really is pretty ugly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But these are not really examples. In the first one, <em>clearly<\/em> does not modify <em>confused<\/em> but is actually what we call a sentence modifier, modifying the idea of the whole sentence. You can tell because it is possible to move the modifier without changing the meaning of the sentence: \u201cClearly, you are confused\u2026.\u201d \u201cYou, clearly, are confused\u2026.\u201d \u201cYou are confused by the situation you have found yourself in, clearly.\u201d In the second sentence, <em>pretty<\/em> is not used in the sense of attractive but rather as an intensifier, like <em>very<\/em> or <em>rather<\/em>: \u201cHis new girlfriend really is very ugly,\u201d or \u201creally ugly,\u201d or extremely ugly.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But let\u2019s not forget that <em>oxymoron<\/em> can refer to any contradiction in terms. For instance, at the school where I teach, we have a provost who claims to be the speaker for the faculty. Except that she has, on at least a couple of occasions, sat in judgment of a faculty member. When asked why the faculty member had no representation, she has replied that she speaks for the faculty. But she cannot represent or speak for the faculty and sit in judgment at the same time. That is oxymoronic. It\u2019s also very, very sad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The still photo is from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=W3qcj2MzPYc\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=W3qcj2MzPYc<\/a>, a video of bits from Laurel and Hardy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Mirriam-Webster word of the day for today is oxymoron. The dictionary defines it as \u201ca combination of&nbsp;contradictory&nbsp;or incongruous words (such as&nbsp;cruel kindness);&nbsp;broadly&nbsp;:&nbsp;something (such as a concept) that is made [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4729,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-word-of-the-day","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4728"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4731,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4728\/revisions\/4731"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.freedomshillprimer.com\/institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}